環保與生活的兩難
環保雖然重要，但有時會與生活便利產生衝突（例如減塑、垃圾分類）。請舉出一個你生活中遇過的例子，說明這個兩難，並提出你的解決方式。
載入中…
這一題的頂標範文與寫作技巧建議先自己寫完、送出批改，再打開對照。打開看範文 ▾收起 ▴
頂標範文與技術分析
這是同一題的頂標等級範文，標色的地方是值得學起來的進階文法句型或用字。
Environmental protection and everyday convenience are often at odds, and I have experienced this tension firsthand when trying to cut down on plastic use. Whenever I visit a bubble tea shop, I am tempted to accept the disposable plastic cup, lid, and straw simply because carrying a reusable cup is cumbersome. Refusing the packaging feels virtuous, yet forgetting my own cup means either giving up the drink or caving in to single-use plastics. To resolve this dilemma, I have adopted two practical habits. First, I keep a foldable silicone cup in my school bag so that it is always within reach. Second, I remind myself that the minor inconvenience of washing a reusable cup is far outweighed by the benefit of keeping plastic waste out of the ocean. Were every consumer to make this small adjustment, the cumulative impact on the environment would be enormous. Ultimately, living sustainably does not demand perfection — it only asks that we make a slightly better choice each day.
技巧說明（5）
①文法規則：'be at odds' 是固定慣用語，意為「互相衝突、對立」，比起普通的 'conflict with' 或 'are in conflict' 更道地精準。句子後半以 'firsthand'（副詞，意為「親身地」）快速帶入個人經驗，符合題目「舉例」的要求，同時用 'when + V-ing'（時間副詞子句省略主詞的分詞句型）使句子更緊湊。②加分原因：若只寫 'Environmental protection and convenience sometimes conflict.'，語感平淡、詞彙層次低。使用 'be at odds' 加上 'firsthand' 立刻展現用字精準度，閱卷老師一眼就能判斷該生詞彙量高於平均。③套用方式：這個句型可以套用在任何「兩者對立」的議題開頭，例如：'Academic pressure and mental health are often at odds, and I have experienced this tension firsthand during exam season.'，效果立竿見影。
①文法規則：句首 'Refusing the packaging' 是動名詞（Gerund）作主詞，後接 'feels virtuous'，描述心理感受。對等連接詞 'yet' 在此取代 'but'，帶有「儘管如此」的轉折語氣，比 'but' 更書面、更有力。句末的 'either...or...' 平行結構列出兩個不理想的結果，使兩難困境的描述更為具體清晰。②加分原因：學生最常寫 'It is good to refuse plastic, but I sometimes forget my cup.'，主詞用 'It' 顯得空洞，且 'but' 過於口語。改用動名詞主詞 + 'yet' 轉折，句子層次感和書面語氣均大幅提升。③套用方式：任何描述兩難的段落都可以套用「動名詞 + feels/seems + 形容詞, yet + 動名詞 + means...」的框架，例如：'Skipping dessert feels disciplined, yet indulging once in a while means keeping a healthy relationship with food.'。
①文法規則：'outweigh' 是「在重要性/分量上超過」的動詞，用被動語態 'is outweighed by' 帶出「代價 vs. 效益」的比較。副詞 'far' 放在被動語態助動詞之後、過去分詞之前，作為強調語氣副詞，表示「遠遠超過」。整個句子的邏輯是：小代價 ≪ 大效益，用一個動詞精準傳達，無須冗長解釋。②加分原因：學生最常寫 'washing a cup is not very difficult, and it is good for the environment.'，這句話邏輯鬆散、用字初級。改用 'is far outweighed by' 之後，同樣的意思讀起來更有說服力，也展現了議論文所需的分析深度。③套用方式：這個句型非常適合議論文的「反駁段落」或「利弊比較」段落，框架為：'The [負面代價] is far outweighed by the [正面效益].'，例如：'The short-term stress of exercising daily is far outweighed by the long-term gains in physical and mental health.'。
①文法規則：這是假設語氣（Subjunctive Mood）的「倒裝省略 if」句型。標準寫法為 'If every consumer were to make this small adjustment, the cumulative impact would be enormous.'，將 'were' 提前至主詞前並省略 'if'，即形成倒裝假設句。'Were + 主詞 + to V' 是學測、指考閱卷老師最欣賞的進階句型之一，因為它既展示文法控制能力，又讓文章語氣更正式、更有論述力道。②加分原因：若只寫 'If everyone does this, the environment will be better.'，不但是條件句（非假設語氣），語氣也缺乏說服力。使用假設語氣倒裝，暗示「這在現實中尚未實現，但若能實現則效果顯著」，邏輯上更嚴謹，語氣上更具感召力。③套用方式：此句型可在任何「若全體社會共同行動」或「若某假設成真」的議論結尾使用，框架為 'Were + 主詞 + to V..., the + 名詞 + would be + 形容詞/名詞.'，例如：'Were every student to spend thirty minutes reading daily, the overall literacy level of our society would improve dramatically.'。
①文法規則：句首副詞 'Ultimately'（最終而言）是高分議論文常見的結論起手式，比 'In conclusion' 更自然、更具書面感。破折號（em dash）在此作為語氣停頓，帶出後半句的「話鋒一轉」效果，比用逗號更有節奏感。'it only asks that we make...' 中的 'that' 子句在語意上接近名詞子句，'make a slightly better choice' 中的 'slightly'（稍微）是精準的程度副詞，傳達「不需要完美，只需進步一點點」的務實論點。②加分原因：結論段若只寫 'To sum up, we should protect the environment.'，毫無新意且空洞。此句用 'does not demand perfection' 回應文章中「兩難」的核心矛盾——即「環保要求太高令人卻步」的心理障礙——提出「只求稍微更好」作為解方，首尾呼應，說理完整，讓閱卷老師感受到作者真正思考過這個議題。③套用方式：這種「讓步＋務實收尾」的結論框架適用於幾乎所有議論題，格式為：'Ultimately, [做某件事] does not demand [完美/極端作為] — it only asks that we [小而可行的行動].'，例如：'Ultimately, being a good friend does not demand constant availability — it only asks that we show up when it truly matters.'。
範文由 WriteUp 依學測評分規準產生，供練習參考，不是大考中心公布的佳作。