美國高中學生每天各種活動時間分配
下圖呈現的是美國某高中的全體學生每天進行各種活動的時間分配，請寫一篇至少120個單詞的英文作文。文分兩段，第一段描述該圖所呈現之特別現象；第二段請說明整體而言，你一天的時間分配與該高中全體學生的異同，並說明其理由。
載入中…
這一題的頂標範文與寫作技巧建議先自己寫完、送出批改，再打開對照。打開看範文 ▾收起 ▴
頂標範文與技術分析
這是同一題的頂標等級範文，標色的地方是值得學起來的進階文法句型或用字。
The bar chart above illustrates how students at an American high school distribute their time across various daily activities. Among all the categories, sleeping takes up the largest portion, amounting to 8.7 hours, which suggests that these students place great importance on rest despite their busy schedules. Following closely behind is study-related activities, occupying 6.4 hours, a figure that reflects the academic demands placed upon them. What stands out most strikingly, however, is the sharp contrast between socializing/leisure (3.8 hours) and religion/volunteer work, which accounts for a mere 0.2 hours. Not only do these students spend little time on volunteer activities, but they also devote only 0.8 hours to exercise, revealing that physical fitness is not prioritized as highly as academics or rest. As for my own schedule, it both resembles and differs from that of these students. Like them, I sleep roughly eight hours a night, for I firmly believe that adequate rest is essential to maintaining concentration in class. However, unlike the students shown in the chart, I spend considerably less time on part-time jobs, since my parents prefer that I focus solely on my studies during this crucial stage of life. Were I given more freedom, I would gladly take on a job to gain real-world experience. Furthermore, I devote more time to exercise than the average student depicted here, as I am convinced that a healthy body is the foundation of a sound mind. In short, while our routines overlap in certain respects, the differences reveal how personal values and circumstances shape the way we spend our time.
技巧說明（5）
這是典型的「分詞構句」用法，用來補充說明前面提到的數據，避免使用「and it occupies 6.4 hours」這種較生硬的句子連接方式。文法規則上，當兩個子句主詞相同時，可以把後面子句的動詞改為現在分詞（occupying），省略主詞與連接詞，讓句子更精簡流暢，同時增加句子的層次感與書面語氣。這種寫法比單純用「and」連接兩個完整句子更高階，因為閱卷老師會注意到你能靈活轉換句子結構，展現句型多樣性。學生在描述圖表數據時，可以套用這個句型，例如：「The second category is leisure, taking up 3.8 hours, a number that shows students' need for relaxation.」
這是「Not only...but also...」的倒裝句型，文法規則是當否定意味的副詞片語（如 Not only）放在句首時，後面的子句必須倒裝，也就是助動詞（do/does/did）要提到主詞前面。這裡原本的句子是「These students do not only spend little time on volunteer activities, but they also devote only 0.8 hours to exercise」，但透過倒裝，語氣更加強烈，也展現出寫作者對複雜句型的掌握度，比起平鋪直敘的句子更能吸引閱卷老師的目光，顯示句型的進階程度。學生可以在強調兩件負面或令人意外的事實時使用此句型，例如寫到自己生活習慣時：「Not only does he skip breakfast every day, but he also stays up till midnight.」
這是與現在事實相反的假設語氣，正常結構為「If I were given more freedom, I would...」，但範文使用了「Were I given」的倒裝形式，省略 If，將 were 提到主詞前面。這是書面英文中較為正式、進階的假設語氣用法，文法規則是：在與現在事實相反的假設句中，若使用 were/had/should 開頭，可以省略 if 並將助動詞倒裝至句首，使句子更簡潔有力，也顯示寫作者對假設語氣有深入掌握，而非只會用最基本的「If I + 過去式」句型。學生在表達「如果情況不同，我會怎麼做」時，可以套用此句型，例如：「Were I to live abroad, I would learn the local language first.」
這裡使用的「for」作為連接詞，意思等同於「because」，但語氣更正式、更書面化，常見於較高階的英文寫作中，用來補充說明前一句的理由。文法上，「for」作連接詞時，只能放在兩個獨立子句之間（不能放在句首），用來補充解釋前面敘述的原因，語氣比「because」更委婉且帶有說明的意味。相較於反覆使用「because」，適時替換成「for」、「since」、「as」等不同的因果連接詞，可以展現字彙與句構的多樣性，避免用字重複，讓文章讀起來更細緻有變化。學生在說明理由時，可以依語境交替使用，例如：「I rarely eat fast food, for I care deeply about my health.」
此句使用「unlike」帶出對比關係，並搭配「considerably」這個精準的程度副詞來修飾「less time」，使對比更具體、更有說服力，而不只是籠統地說「less time」。文法規則上，「unlike + N」是介系詞片語，置於句首用來對比兩者的差異，後面須接完整子句；而「considerably」屬於程度副詞，用來加強比較級的語氣，是學測作文中常被忽略但能有效提升用字精準度的技巧。比起單純寫「I don't do part-time jobs like them」，使用 unlike 開頭並加上程度副詞，能讓句子結構更正式、語意更細膩。學生在做「比較與對比」類型的題目時，可以大量套用此句型，例如：「Unlike my classmates, I spend considerably more time reading for pleasure.」
範文由 WriteUp 依學測評分規準產生，供練習參考，不是大考中心公布的佳作。